Sep 5

Michael Arrington

Bad news for Craigslist users who like to peruse the Erotic Services Adult Services section of their site. It’s gone, replaced by a large black and white “censored” logo.

I’ve reached out to Craigslist for comment and await their reply. But the choice of words is significant – the section wasn’t simply removed, the censored word was used.

The site has been embattled as old press and state attorneys general use any excuse to blame sex crimes on the site. From South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster’s failed crusade against them to a variety of press stories about sex and other crimes. If it’s just a sex crime it isn’t a story. But if a listing on Craigslist was involved, it’s a big story.

Craigslist has fought back using little more than their blog and logic. And they’re right. Having prostitution up front and regulated, as Craigslist does, means less crime is associated with it. It’s not like prostitution, sometimes called the world’s oldest profession, was invented on the site.

The fact that eBay and others do exactly the same thing, but without human review and moderation, doesn’t seem to matter. Craigslist Sex is what scares the general population, and it’s what the press and the politicians will continue to use to get their hits and votes.

So the Craigslist Adult Section was removed. Is the world now a safer place?

Update: This only appears to affect U.S. sites, so if you’re looking for a happy ending in Saskatoon or the West Bank, have at it.

http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/03/craigslist-censored-adult-section-comes-down/

Mistress Eva says: This is a sad day for many of my Craigslist hoes! There is no telling how many of my sluts wanked to those ads let alone met the Female and Male escorts. I know many of my sissy bitches had fantasies of making me money through that site.

They say prostitution is the oldest profession in the world. It has thrived for a long time and a another site will take off where Craigslist finished. For Craigslist, it was a multimillion business so you know there are people ready to capitalize on this censorship.

To my cock whores…The Casual Encounters Section is going strong! ;-)

Aug 26

Despite recession, good time for sex toy industry: Amazon, Brooklyn’s
Shag sales on the rise!

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/files/images/0807-reasons-sex.jpg

BY Joe Jackson
DAILY NEWS WRITER
The Dow may be down, but the sex toy industry is heating up online and
in store. From Web behemoth Amazon to Brooklyn boutique store Shag,
sales of an increasing range of sexual accessories are on the rise.

“Everyone says thank God you opened - it’s about time,” said Sam Bard,
36, who co-founded Shag in Williamsburg last December.

“Each month’s been better than the last,” she said.

The “sexy shop” sells everything from vintage handcuffs to body paints
and hosts sex-themed events like “introductory lessons in rope-bondage.”

Bard believes the recession helped the business, which opened on
Roebling St. for rent considered low for the gentrified neighborhood.

“More couples are staying at home to save money, so rather [than]
spending $150 on a one-time dinner, they will spend the same amount
for toys that will continue to be used indefinitely,” she said.

Customers agree. “The expense of the toys is so insignificant compared
to the growth of the relationship sexually,” said Heather, 40, who
admits that even though she’s on a tight budget, she and her boyfriend
laid down $150 on a “his and her” vibrator.

Sex accessories store Babeland, which has three outlets in the city,
makes half of its sales online. It recorded an 18% spike in Web
visitors and a 13% jump in sales in 2009.

“New Yorkers account for the biggest percentage of our online sales,”
said spokeswoman Pamela Doan.

Meanwhile, even household company names are getting in on the action.
Amazon launched its Sexual Wellness page in 2003 with 338 items,
mainly condoms and lubricants. But it soon began to market more
adventurous items - restraints, vibrators and flavored lubricants.

“We’ve seen this category grow pretty significantly over the last
couple of years,” said spokeswoman Charmaine Diploa. Now the company
stocks nearly 60,000 items, with adult toys and games being the
biggest share.

A recent week’s best-selling item was the “Magic Wand Massager” - a
nonphallic vibrator - and “Doc Johnson Lucid Dream #5″ - a multispeed
waterproof stimulator.

Amazon reckons its sales surge is due to its discretion - and unique
brand of convenience.

“Customers receive an Amazon box and no one needs to know what’s
inside except for that customer,” said Diploa. “And they love the fact
they can purchase a vibrator, a watch and a Kindle all in one place.”

(Mistress Eva says, There will always be death taxes and SEX! Until the human race ends, SEX will sell. Ironically, my Phone Domination/Phone Sex Business is doing well considering we are in a Recession. August was one of my busiest months! Now maybe I should sell sex toys too!)

Mistress Eva
DommeEmpire.com
Call Me! 1-800-TO-FLIRT Extension: 94-39-577

Aug 25

(Hello, Its Mistress Eva! I know many of my sluts feel that they are a woman trapped in a man’s body. Some have thought of having sex change operation. Sometimes fantasy is better than reality.)

http://www.bilerico.com/2010/06/sex_reassignment_surgery_when_things_go_wrong.php?utm_source=tbpfront&utm_medium=bestof&utm_campaign=best_of_b
Sex Reassignment Surgery: When things go wrong

Filed by: Amy Hunter

Sometimes, things go wrong with the surgery.

It has many names and many acronyms, SRS, GRS, GCS-Sex Reassignment
Surgery. Whatever you call it, it is an irrevocable commitment and
irreversible step should you choose to take it.

Male to female (MtF) transpeople talk about it a lot. You know: Are
you, or aren’t you? Is she pre-op, or post-op? Who did yours? Whom are
you going to have do yours? We talk about it a lot, except…when
things go wrong. Then–we don’t say much at all. In fact, we won’t
talk about it publicly, but it happens. We cover it up as if we should
be ashamed. We feel damaged.

Something odd ensues, much like forty or fifty years ago. Back then,
people spoke in hushed tones, if at all about the family member,
colleague, or friend who had certain illnesses-the “C word”-only
whispered. Many times this lack of openness about such matters led
directly to preventable consequences–even deaths.

We need to talk about healthcare for the transgender individual and I
want to talk–openly about my experience–about what can happen when
things go wrong with SRS.

I Knew There Were Risks

While death is an unlikely result of complications from sex
reassignment surgery, things can and do go wrong with the procedure.
Even the most skilled of surgeons are, after all, human and as with
any surgery, there are risks.

The information packet sent to me from my surgeon’s office listed the
possible things that could go wrong. I had read extensively about what
my body would have done to it after Propofol sent me to a dreamless
sleep. Everything I found on the internet listed possible
complications. One was a worst-case scenario, but the websites always
mentioned it last and even then, it happened so seldom, most said,
that it was a risk hardly worth mentioning.

My pre-operative appointment, a scant two hours before I signed the
waiver, was brief. The surgeon asked a few questions, looked me over,
pronounced me suitable for surgery and added that I had enough tissue
for good depth. Almost as an afterthought, she said we needed to go
over “this stuff”. We got to that last, not worth mentioning but still
possible, worst-case scenario thing. Of course, it needed to be
brought up but in almost four hundred surgeries “it had only happened
just once, so we don’t worry about it”. I didn’t.

Just before I walked into the surgical suite, I signed the waiver.

I slumped to the floor of the shower that morning in Trinidad
Colorado, water and reality raining down on me. Bewilderment and
terror replaced hope, which swirled toward the drain along with the
feces and the blood. Emergency surgeries there, four more at home in
Kalamazoo and another in Denver have all failed.

Chronic pain, heavy narcotics addiction, and bouts of deep depression
are the hushed legacies I have battled. Left with a possibly permanent
colostomy and a painful, fibrous lump between my legs where a vagina
should be, it is nearly impossible not to revisit the devastation
daily. It is now two and a half years later.

The infrastructure of a natal male body is not the same as a natal
female. The male pubic bone is lower and in my body, tipped somewhat,
making it hard for my surgeon to get the geometry just right. In my
case, there probably wasn’t really quite enough space to allow for the
proper thickness of septum between the new vaginal wall and the rectal
wall.

A slight tear in my colon from a retractor, was all that was necessary
to compromise an otherwise flawless procedure. I had developed a
rectal-vaginal fistula. This problem happens to natal women too, often
as a complication from difficult childbirth or certain cancers.
Frankly, the success rate for repairing the defect in natal women is
not good either. It often takes multiple surgeries for them too. What
makes it even harder for the transwoman?

The Endemic Problems In Transsexual Healthcare

My story–and my surgeon’s– illuminate important problems endemic to
healthcare for the transgender and specifically, the transsexual person.

Lack of access- Discrimination by doctors and hospitals and inability
to get insurance or pay outright makes it difficult, if not
impossible, for many transgender people to access care - primary or
specialized.
Lack of knowledge- Documentation of protocols for care of patients
undergoing transition is severely limited. Additionally, techniques
for remedial care of complications are not well developed; instead,
procedures designed for amelioration of fistulae in natal females are
used.
Lack of training- There exist no specialized courses of study or
teaching hospitals for SRS surgeons.
Lack of experience- While some surgeons learn techniques from other
doctors already performing SRS, there are no residencies for those
wishing to become SRS surgeons.
Lack of inter-disciplinary collaboration- Ignorance, discrimination
and arrogance on the part of specialists often block those needing
specialized post-SRS care.
In 2008 both the American Medical Association and the American
Psychological Association issued white papers - policy statements
calling for equal and fair access to healthcare for the transgender
community. Both organizations recognized lack of access to health care
as a growing crisis among transgender people.

Significantly, however, while both bodies asked the insurance industry
to remove discriminatory blocks for transpeople, neither the APA nor
the AMA asked for better training and documentation of skills. Neither
organization called for unilateral coverage of transition related care
and procedures. The APA resolution reads thus (emphasis mine):

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT APA recognizes the efficacy,
benefit and medical necessity of gender transition treatments for
appropriately evaluated individuals and calls upon public and private
insurers to cover these medically necessary treatments;

And the AMA:

RESOLVED, That our American Medical Association support public and
private health insurance coverage for treatment of gender identity
disorder as recommended by the patient’s physician.)

Ok, pretty strong statements, right? Look again and in particular,
consider the italics. The APA resolution makes one BIG assumption-that
you will be able to be “appropriately evaluated” , this requires you
to have found and be able to pay for a psychologist, assuming of
course, that you want to be evaluated. The AMA resolution assumes much
the same thing; that you have a physician and that he or she is
willing to make such recommendations, if, in fact, they are so
qualified.

Whom Should I Go See When No One Will See Me?

I am associated with a LGBT resource center so, I get calls for things
like, “Who is a trans-friendly electrologist” but the most frequent
call I get is “My family doctor won’t prescribe me hormones. Whom
should I see?”

To my knowledge, there are only two therapists in this area who take
transgender clients, neither is a clinical psychologist who can render
a surgical readiness opinion for SRS. There are one or two primary
care physicians in the area who will prescribe hormones but, after
hearing stories of one of them prescribing the exact same regimen for
every patient, I am more than reluctant to send people to him. The
nearest endocrinologist who takes transgender patients is ninety
minutes from here. My own primary care doctor, admittedly, has no
knowledge of how to dose a transwoman either pre-operatively or, post-
operatively. He has left it up to me to tell him.

There is no curriculum, no specialization, no residency, and no board
certification for SRS surgeons. No medical texts detail the
procedures. Most SRS surgeons have followed in the footsteps of
pioneers.

In my doctor’s case, the pioneer was legendary Colorado surgeon,
Stanley Biber M.D. whose compassion for a social worker led him to
develop the most celebrated sex reassignment practice in the States.
The surgeon who did my SRS learned from him and took over his practice
when he retired. Soon, she began refining his technique and developing
and teaching her own. Today, she routinely performs SRS as many as two
hundred times a year.

There are surgeons who want to do SRS-who have trained under doctors
as mine did, but find it difficult, if not impossible, to find a
facility that will grant privileges for SRS. Often, these surgeons may
have the technical skills for SRS-urology, gynecological and plastic
surgery, but hospitals will not grant access because there is no
accredited course of specialization or board certification.

This may not be all bad. While there are a few new surgeons doing SRS
every year, are they really getting the training necessary to
accomplish not just the surgery itself but, adequate follow-up care
too? Again, no curriculum, no specialized course of study, no board
certification, but perhaps more significantly, certainly for the
patient, there is no roadmap for what to do when things go wrong.

My Surgeon Doesn’t Know How to Fix It

Then, seemingly, neither does anyone else. My SRS surgeon attempted to
fix the two-inch tear in my colon while I was still there, the repair
failed in less than twelve hours. Next, a colon-rectal surgeon was
found in the nearest large city and brought in to look at me. He
aborted his attempt to repair the defect and instead, performed a full
colostomy.

I flew home to Michigan with a bag attached to my abdomen and thick
pads between my legs to soak up the blood.

A local colon-rectal surgeon, persuaded to see me by my primary care
physician, was upbeat. Each time I went into surgery with him he would
encourage me, saying “this time we’ll get it”. Coming out of surgery,
my spouse Cindy would hear from him how well it went and that he was
“optimistic this time” the closure would take and a new defect would
not open up.

Another surgeon who has had some success with other fistula patients
seemed promising, but eight months later, under the pressure of a
barium test, that repair too, failed.

I have had stitch-overs, mucosal flap advancements, and pelvic floor
muscle mobilization; each new approach diminishes what viable tissue I
have for another attempt. I have tried to go into every surgery with a
realistic outlook; multiple failures however, become difficult to bear.

Still, I am one of the fortunate ones with this complication; I stand
a chance, albeit small, for an eventually favorable outcome. Many
transwoman are not able to find a colon-rectal surgeon who is willing
to work on a transperson, much less “someone else’s problem”, nor do
all of us have the means.

Even if you are fortunate enough to locate a doctor–and in my case,
privileged to have insurance and financial means to cover remedial
procedures, then there is still only a slim chance for alleviation of
this humiliating and debilitating condition. One surgeon, out of
frustration no doubt, finally washed his hands of me saying, “well,
you did this to yourself”.

Losing the Patient

I am not writing this to slam the physician who did my SRS. Far from
it, she is a dear friend. We have shared much together, laughing, and
holding each other; the two of us have grappled for footing. We have
cried together, and yes, yelled at each other. She is an icon in the
transgender community and heroine to many transsexuals. She is also
perhaps the most accomplished of the few surgeons doing primary SRS in
the United States.

However, even a surgeon as accomplished as mine cannot overcome
obstacles that she has no training for and little experience
resolving. There are unseen and unsaid barriers that come into play
when someone with complications from SRS must seek treatment aside
from their original surgeon.

As I mentioned before, most surgeons just do not want to deal with
what they may perceive to be another doctor’s mistakes, if they are
willing to look at you at all. A person would be hard pressed to get a
doctor to admit that they are closed-minded, yet there are many
doctors who simply will not work on-or treat a transsexual.

My surgeon has told me, and has repeated often, that she would see me
through this. I believe she has tried, but somewhere in the mix of
discrimination, ego, and fear, the patient has been lost.

Aug 25

What a mouthful! This is the Technical Fetish Term for someone who is sexually turned on by chicks with dicks! Like Shemales, Crossdressers, Sissies, and Transvestities. I get many callers who really get into chicks with dicks but have no interest in being with a real man. To many, a sexy woman with a dick is true perfection. Even better if they have big tits, shaven pubes and a large dick. The more womanly, the better! A lot of these guys also happen to be big fans of women with strapons. They love to submit to the feminine cock.

One of the sexiest Transsexual I have seen is Tara Emory. You should really check out her site and possibly join! Go to: http://www.tara-ts.com

http://cdn2.fetlife.com/106/106442/a5e00132373a7031000fd987a3c9f87b_20100731022128_510.jpg

Mistress Eva
DommeEmpire.com
Call Button

Aug 19

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/16/life-without-gender.html

Are We Facing a Genderless Future?

A small but growing number of people are rejecting being labeled male
or female.

by Barbara Kantrowitz and Pat WingertAugust 16, 2010

Click here to check out photos of transgender Americans

New Bodies, New Lives
This spring, an Australian named Norrie May-Welby made headlines
around the world as the world’s first legally genderless person when
the New South Wales Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages sent the
Sydney resident a certificate containing neither M for male or F for
female.

For a few days, it appeared that the 48-year-old activist and
performer had won a long legal battle to be declared “sex not
specified”—the only category that felt right to this immigrant from
Scotland. May-Welby’s journey of gender identity can only be
characterized as a long and winding road. Registered male at birth,
May-Welby began taking female hormones at 23 and had sex-change
surgery to become a woman, but now doesn’t take any hormones and
identifies as genderless. The prized piece of paper May-Welby sought
is called a Recognised Details Certificate, and it’s given to
immigrants to Australia who want to record a sex change.

But the victory was short-lived. After so much publicity, it was
perhaps inevitable that the New South Wales government would backtrack—
which it did a few days later, saying the registry didn’t have the
legal authority to issue a certificate with anything but male or
female. May-Welby (who now goes by the single name Norrie) has filed
an appeal with the Australian Human Rights Commission.

It’s easy to dismiss this case as just one more bizarre news story
from Down Under, but May-Welby’s case could also represent the future
of gender identity. Although no one is keeping statistics, researchers
who study gender say a small but growing number of people (including
some who have had sex-change operations) consider themselves “gender
neutral” or “gender variant.” Their stories vary widely. Some find
that even after surgery, they simply can’t ignore previous years of
experience living as another gender. Others may feel that their gender
identity is fluid. Still others are experimenting with where they feel
most comfortable on what they see as a continuum of gender. “For some,
it’s a form of protest because gender is such a strong organizing
principle in our society,” says Walter Bockting, an associate
professor and clinical psychologist at the University of Minnesota
Medical School who has been studying transgender health since 1986.
“Their identities expand our thinking about gender.”

In fact, some researchers compare the evolution in thinking about
gender to the struggle that began a generation ago for gay and lesbian
rights. Dr. Jack Drescher is a member of an American Psychiatric
Association (APA) committee that is currently reviewing changes to the
fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, which is used
around the world by clinicians, researchers, regulatory agencies, and
insurance companies to classify mental disorders. DSM-5, as it’s
called, won’t be published until 2013, but Drescher’s committee is
reconsidering the diagnosis of gender-identity disorder, which
encompasses people who do not identify with the gender assigned to
them by biology.

The current debate echoes the controversy over the APA’s 1973 decision
to modify the second edition of the DSM by declaring that
homosexuality could be considered a mental disorder only if it was
disturbing to the patient. Drescher’s committee thought about dropping
the diagnosis of gender-identity disorder altogether, but realized
that if it did, people who wanted treatment (sex-change surgery,
hormones, or talk therapy) wouldn’t be able to get the diagnosis they
need for insurance coverage. Instead, Drescher says, the committee is
proposing changing the name to “gender incongruence” and making the
diagnosis contingent on the person feeling significant distress over
their gender confusion. “We didn’t want to pathologize all expressions
of gender variance just because they were not common or made someone
uncomfortable,” Drescher says.

But that seemingly simple change of language could help usher in a new
era, in which a person’s gender could be expressed or experienced as
male, female, “in between,” or “otherwise.” “People who work in this
area have very flexible notions of gender,” Drescher says. “We don’t
want to force people to fit into a doctor’s categories,” even though,
he concedes, most cultures “tend to think in binaries.”

Bockting predicts that such binary thinking will eventually disappear.
Many scientists, he says, see gender as a continuum and acknowledge
that some people naturally fall in the middle. Gender, Bockting says,
“develops between the biological and the environmental. You can’t
always detect gender by physical evidence. You have to ask the person
how they identify themselves; in that sense, it’s psychological.”

And gender isn’t synonymous with sex, he says, although the
distinction may elude the layman. Sex, Bockting says, is assigned at
birth based on the appearance of external genitalia. But, he says, “to
determine a person’s gender identity, you have to wait until they grow
up and can describe how they identify their gender.” And being
genderless or gender-neutral isn’t the same thing as being asexual.
“If you are asexual,” he says, “you are not interested in having sex
with other people,” while gender-neutral people may be attracted to
men, women, both sexes, or other people who are gender-neutral.

And while May-Welby’s story may seem out there, Bockting says it’s not
uncommon for people undergoing sex changes to find that surgery
doesn’t resolve all their gender-identity issues. “With time,” he
says, “they accept a certain amount of ambiguity … We have this idea
that people take hormones and undergo surgery and become the other
gender. But in reality it’s more complicated.”

Even before the advent of sex-change surgery, there were always people
who felt they didn’t fit into either gender. In India, a group of
people called hijra have existed for centuries. They are typically
biological males who dress as women but consider themselves to have no
gender, Bockting says. There is also a long tradition of eunuch
culture. Even today, other countries are more comfortable with the
idea of gender variance. Drescher says that France has removed
transsexuality from its list of psychiatric disorders and put it in
the category of rare diseases. The British government has also
declared that transsexuality is “not a mental illness,” but people who
want a sex-change can get treatment under the National Health Service.

How all the debate will play out in this country is still unclear, but
college students may be among those leading the charge for change.
Many campuses—including Harvard, Penn and Michigan—now offer gender
neutral housing and more unisex bathrooms to accommodate students who
don’t fall neatly into male or female categories. The Common
Application, which is used by most college applicants, just announced
that it is considering adding voluntary questions that would give
students a broader array of choices to describe their gender identity
and allow them to state their sexual orientation, after gay advocates
urged the change. How long before such changes begin to show up in
other parts of society is unclear. But Drescher says he is certain of
one thing after a lifetime of working with gender: “There is no way
that six billion people can be categorized into two groups.” Now if we
could only figure out the pronoun problem.

Aug 3

America Wins, Government Loses Huge Obscenity Trial
by Marty Klein

John Stagliano was set free last week when a federal judge ended his obscenity trial on procedural grounds. If convicted, John would have been jailed for 32 years and had his home and business confiscated.

Instead, a few million dollars of your tax money was wasted by a Department of Justice investigation, purchase, viewing, and indictment of Milk Nymphos, Storm Squirters, and Fetish Fanatic. These are DVDs that depict legal activity, whose actors are all certified as over 18. Neither of these facts was challenged by the government.

The charge was simply that the DVDs appealed to the average person’s “prurient interest,” were “patently offensive,” and “lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” These are the actual words of the Miller Test that guide the law. If you can get a jury to agree that a given recording, painting, book, DVD, or stage show meets these three tests, the government can declare the thing “obscene.” It then loses its First Amendment protection, and it creator and distributor can be sent to jail.

That’s right—the depiction of a legal activity can be illegal. Sex is so special, that we’re not allowed to see or hear about things that we’re allowed to do. I don’t know why more people are outraged about this.

The first consideration—“prurient interest”—is not only archaic (do you know what “prurient” means?), it’s completely subjective. How are people supposed to judge whether a film or song appeals to their neighbors’ healthy or unhealthy interest in sex?

The second consideration—“patently offensive”—is equally subjective. Along with “prurient interest,” this is a bizarre standard of lawfulness. If being “offensive” is illegal, there are some Congressmembers who shouldn’t be allowed to wear shorts in public. And Joan Rivers should be executed immediately.

The third consideration—“lacks value”—elevates the personal opinions of a dozen random people to god-like status (especially if you’re the defendant), and begs for carloads of experts. Is Milk Nymphos satire? An indictment of sexist prohibitions against breast-feeding in public? A documentation of creative use of enemas, or associated paraphilias?

When the Supreme Court first described the Miller Test in 1973, it was intended to codify the chaotic state of American censorship at that time. But it is shockingly subjective. It asks a jury of lay people to discern what their neighbors think about sex—a subject about which people are notoriously shy discussing seriously.

And so here was John Stagliano, in the year 2010—a year in which the planet is melting, and the Taliban wants to destroy our country, and millions of Americans have lost their jobs and are losing their homes—here was John Stagliano on trial in federal court for producing and selling adult videos to adults. Not one single customer had complained. The government had decided to go after him.

After an 18-month investigation, months of trial preparation, and days of courtroom activity, Judge Richard J. Leon, appointed by President George W. Bush, threw the case out on procedural grounds. The government’s star witness and the government’s lead prosecutor couldn’t get their stories straight. They indirectly raised the question of the judge’s own ethics, a question the judge firmly denounced.

I’m thrilled that John walks free, because he clearly did nothing wrong. But I’m disappointed that the jury did not get a chance to rule the DVDs not obscene. Judge Leon’s decision demands that the government do a more thorough, professional job when censoring what we can watch in the privacy of our homes. I wish instead he had told the government to stay out of our homes and our bedrooms. I wish the jury had had a chance to say the same.

Instead, people like John Stagliano—yes, who are in it for the money, not for public service— will have to risk everything so we can enjoy the American freedoms we take for granted. Next time you watch a porn video, or The Daily Show or a violent video game, next time you listen to a rap music on a CD or at a concert, give silent thanks to John. He almost went to jail for you and me.

Source: Carnal Nation (http://clp.ly/118JO)

Jul 12

Craigslist Projected To Earn $36 Million This Year From Adult Ads

By Matthew Lawrence

Experts predict that popular classified site Craigslist will earn $36
million this year from adult services ads, three times the 2009 profit
from adult ads. Based out of an unassuming San Francisco storefront,
the company’s known for allowing users to find jobs, rent apartments,
and write creepy letters to Whole Foods employees; it’s also predicted
to bring in $122 million this year, a 22% increase from 2009, reports
the New York Times [1].

In nineteen major American cities, users must pay to post job
listings, and New Yorkers must also pay for real estate listings. But
adult ads now cost $10 each ($5 for repeat postings) in all 438 of the
site’s US markets. And that adds up to big profits.

James Buckmaster, Craigslist CEO, said he would not confirm the
numbers because the traditionally secretive company does not discuss
its finances publicly. (The revenue estimate was released by industry
analysts independent Advanced Interactive Media Group.) Initially,
Craigslist committed to donate profits from sex ads to charity but
reversed its decision last May, declining from then on to acknowledge
where the money goes. The company also decided last May to raise the
price for adult services ads from $5 to $10.

The AIM group estimated that the site’s expenses–salaries, servers,
bandwidth and legal fees–will cost under $50 million this year,
meaning that the company could see a $70 million profit in 2010. Mr.
Buckmaster responded to the Times via e-mail:

Of the sex ads, he wrote, “Of the thousands of U.S. venues that carry
adult service ads, including venues operated by some of the largest
and best known companies in the U.S., Craigslist has done the best and
most responsible job of combating child exploitation and human
trafficking.”

From www.nytimes.com [2] via clp.ly [2]
The company has started two non-profits. The Craigslist Foundation,
which received $648,000 in 2008, does not make any donations. But the
newer Craigslist Charitable Trust, which was started in 2008 by Mr.
Buckmaster and site founder Craig Newmark, is even more of a mystery;
Mr. Buckmaster refused to explain the trust’s purpose to the Times.

In 2008, after much criticism, Craigslist eliminated the “erotic
services” section and replaced it with the “adult services” category.
In order to post ads now, users must have a registered account, which
requires e-mail verification and a phone number. (The system is
totally faulty, though, because people change phone numbers fairly
regularly these days and plenty of people can’t create accounts
because previous people with that number–or household members who
share a landline–can’t post ads.)Craigslist Projected To Earn $36 Million This Year From Adult Ads

By Matthew Lawrence
Created 04/26/2010 - 7:29am
Experts predict that popular classified site Craigslist will earn $36
million this year from adult services ads, three times the 2009 profit
from adult ads. Based out of an unassuming San Francisco storefront,
the company’s known for allowing users to find jobs, rent apartments,
and write creepy letters to Whole Foods employees; it’s also predicted
to bring in $122 million this year, a 22% increase from 2009, reports
the New York Times [1].

In nineteen major American cities, users must pay to post job
listings, and New Yorkers must also pay for real estate listings. But
adult ads now cost $10 each ($5 for repeat postings) in all 438 of the
site’s US markets. And that adds up to big profits.

James Buckmaster, Craigslist CEO, said he would not confirm the
numbers because the traditionally secretive company does not discuss
its finances publicly. (The revenue estimate was released by industry
analysts independent Advanced Interactive Media Group.) Initially,
Craigslist committed to donate profits from sex ads to charity but
reversed its decision last May, declining from then on to acknowledge
where the money goes. The company also decided last May to raise the
price for adult services ads from $5 to $10.

The AIM group estimated that the site’s expenses–salaries, servers,
bandwidth and legal fees–will cost under $50 million this year,
meaning that the company could see a $70 million profit in 2010. Mr.
Buckmaster responded to the Times via e-mail:

Of the sex ads, he wrote, “Of the thousands of U.S. venues that carry
adult service ads, including venues operated by some of the largest
and best known companies in the U.S., Craigslist has done the best and
most responsible job of combating child exploitation and human
trafficking.”

From www.nytimes.com [2] via clp.ly [2]
The company has started two non-profits. The Craigslist Foundation,
which received $648,000 in 2008, does not make any donations. But the
newer Craigslist Charitable Trust, which was started in 2008 by Mr.
Buckmaster and site founder Craig Newmark, is even more of a mystery;
Mr. Buckmaster refused to explain the trust’s purpose to the Times.

In 2008, after much criticism, Craigslist eliminated the “erotic
services” section and replaced it with the “adult services” category.
In order to post ads now, users must have a registered account, which
requires e-mail verification and a phone number. (The system is
totally faulty, though, because people change phone numbers fairly
regularly these days and plenty of people can’t create accounts
because previous people with that number–or household members who
share a landline–can’t post ads.)

Jul 1

BDSM, once viewed as the exclusive fiefdom of really creepy perverts, has crossed over and become quasi-respectable, stylish and safe.

It’s just another day at The Armory in San Francisco: A bound and naked woman is laid out on a stylish serving table. Elegantly-dressed people of both sexes gather around—enjoying the view, apparently—and take turns having their way with her. Various devices are deployed—dildos, floggers, electrical stimulators. She says “Thank you, sir” and “Thank you, madam” frequently.

Welcome to “The Upper Floor,” a high-definition Internet reality show where, website copy states, “real submissive women and real submissive men become house slaves to be dominated, trained, punished, spanked, whipped, and fucked … Inspired by the legendary French BDSM erotic novel The Story of O, The Upper Floor illustrates real lifestyle BDSM as it is lived by 24/7 slaves and Masters, complete with … explicit sex in bondage, punishment, erotic humiliation, and more.”

The Upper Floor is a project of Kink.com, a thriving pornography business that was founded by Peter Acworth, a British-born entrepreneur and lifelong aficionado of BDSM (for Bondage, Domination, Submission—or Sadism—and Masochism). Kink.com sells subscriptions to websites with names like Hogtied.com, SexandSubmission.com and, yes, TheUpperFloor.com. Acworth often attends these, er, corporate events. “He’s the master of the house,” says colleague John Sander.

Only in Satan’s City by the Bay, right? Not exactly. Acworth was recently invited to speak at a summit on innovation convened by the ever-so-respectable The Economist. That’s right—the king of kink was given a place on the dais alongside a Harvard Business School professor, an Intuit business executive and other decent folk. Whether you view this as the end of civilization or a sign of progress, one thing is sure: a barrier has come down.

BDSM is all over our entertainment media, too. In her latest music video, Christina Aguilera slaps a riding crop against her palm, laps from a cat dish, and sports a rhinestone-studded ball gag. In movies like the 2005 comedy hit The Wedding Crashers and television shows like the self-consciously low-brow mockumentary RENO 911!, kinky scenes are played for laughs.

The lesson, kiddies? BDSM, once viewed as the exclusive fiefdom of really creepy perverts, has crossed over and become quasi-respectable, stylish and safe. Comical, even!

The shifting public perception of BDSM is one of those seeming overnight changes that was centuries in the making. In the late 18th Century, the Marquis de Sade put his profoundly sick-puppy stamp on kink, firmly establishing it as sex play (sex pain, really) between non-consenting adults. A hundred years later, when psychologists started studying this behavior, they found their subjects in insane asylums. “Criminals were their point of reference,” says Denver-based sex therapist Neil Cannon. No wonder, then, that BDSM meant a brute in a basement with an unwilling woman and a whip.

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE ARTICLE!

Mistree Eva Says: I personally do not like this trend. I liked it when BDSM was Dark, Mysterious and forbidden. Alas, its still Taboo enough hat you don’t want vanilla friends, family and coworkers knowing that you are into BDSM. If you are not “out”, you still have to be careful with your kinky PICS and your scene names. So its still Taboo on many levels!

Jun 12

http://www.sunpostweekly.com/2010/06/03/sacred-sex/

Sacred Sex

[ 0 ] June 3, 2010 | Dr. Sonjia
Does religion influence your sex life?

If so, you’re nothing like the Miamians I asked, each of whom assured
me that the church buts out of their bedroom. Don’t misunderstand
the situation because I didn’t speak to any atheists and all admitted
they attended services (at least on holidays) at their church, mosque,
or temple. Despite attempts to stay in the good graces of God, most
also admitted to contradicting renowned religious rules by doing the
deed premaritally, praying to prevent procreation. But is it really
rationale for religion to reject the righteous ritual of lovers
lusting to learn?

The Baptist, Catholic, Hindu, Islamic, Jewish, Methodist and Mormon
religions all frown, if not forbid, sex outside of marriage.
Buddhism blesses sex if the persons involved believe it’s for the
right reasons, and some reform branches of Judaism are also lifting
the guilt on committed couples shacking up. But you better wait for
wedding bells if you’re a member of the other religions because sex
among singles is still considered sinful. So how’s that working out?

The idea of amorous activity among adolescents was absolutely absurd
to the nuns ruling the all-girls high school I attended so sex
education was never administered and one of my closest Catholic
friends delivered her baby just before 12th grade graduation. Several
years later I was a young professor in New York teaching human
sexuality when a 22 year old Muslim male student approached me for
advice on overcoming disturbing dreams that caused him to wake daily
at dawn to wash his sheets before his mother obtained evidence of his
desperate desires. He described his attraction to women and his
struggles to control what he considered immoral, unacceptable
behavior. TV was turned off to reduce temptation, masturbation was
also a religious violation, and he was not allowed to date or marry
until his older brother married, a prospect which was nowhere in
sight. Overwhelmed with shame about his inability to abstain, he
willed the unconscious explosions to stop while he slept.
Unfortunately praying doesn’t provide practical relief from nature’s
normal urges and punishing people for practicing pleasure upon oneself
in response to real hormonal reactions isn’t increasing attendance at
church.

Solo sex provides fool proof protection from unwanted consequences yet
many religious figures demonize desires to do yourself even when
marriage isn’t an accessible option. Years ago, Christian pastors
orally attacked me after I hosted a health radio show in the Cayman
Islands involving a caller that asked if masturbation could be harmful
to his health. Without ever using the ‘M’ word, I assured him
addiction was the only potential risk and provided information to help
determine if his habit qualified him as an addict. The Christian
pastors were livid and loud, shouting about the sinfulness of self
stimulation while simultaneous whispers of “everyone does it” followed
me all over the island. Here’s the real deal: Religious rules and
bedroom behaviors rarely coexist in reality.

Like almost half of all Jewish people, a Jewish girlfriend of mine is
in love with a non-Jewish man whom she lives with. We listened to
the birds chirp over brunch at Scorch last weekend and I asked how
religion influenced her sex life. “Sex is blessed in the Jewish
religion.” She is certainly right if we’re discussing married people
whom are both Jewish but, according to the information I got my hands
on, absolute acceptance isn’t assured when interfaith and premarital
play are in the mix. Are people pioneering new religious norms to fit
into their lifestyle?

Another friend of mine is an unmarried mother of five children
fathered by the same man. She lives with the father of her children
and dresses to the nines every Sunday to attend Baptist church with
her family. Contrary to Baptist principles that denounce sex outside
of a legally recognized marriage, she explained that she doesn’t need
an official piece of paper to define her relationship bond and
considers herself married. Do religious practices guide anyone’s
private decisions anymore?

Apparently not. In 2004, the U.S. Census reported the average age of
marriage in the U.S. is almost 26 for women and over 27 for men. In
contrast, most kids are having sex before they get out of high school.
Are these kids’ normal or immoral indications of religion’s failure to
halt hormones?

If religion wants to be an influential part of productive societies,
it’s time for religion to grow up along with the rest of the world.
Long ago, females got married before puberty and developed into a
woman under the watchful eyes of her husband’s family before having
sex. There was no possibility of intercourse outside of marriage
because she was locked down at 12 years old. Times have changed and in
most places, it’s illegal for children to be married before puberty.
Isn’t it time for religion to change too?

Lots of people are searching to believe in something bigger than self
and need someone to believe in them. Religious leaders are missing
awesome recruitment opportunities by enforcing unrealistic behavior
codes that foster, guilt and shame among single people in love. More
seekers would accept the healing powers of the church/mosque/temple if
they felt accepted, appreciated, needed, and normal. Casting human
desires that have existed throughout history as evil is so over. If
religion wants more players in the game, the rules have to be updated
to accept some safe, satisfying self-loving as well as sensual
relationships among singles.

As one respondent perfectly summarized, “It’s time for the Church to
realize we’re all the same religion in the bedroom, saying the same
prayer, “Oh God! Oh God! Oh God!”

(Mistress Eva says: it should be “Oh Goddess! Oh Goddess! Oh Goddess!”)

Jun 11

A Troubled Rape Case
The high-profile rape charges against Deputy District Attorney Michael Gressett are tainted by questionable facts, unorthodox prosecutorial conduct, and the unmistakable whiff of politics.
By John Geluardi

Chris Duffey
“This case has stirred up a shit storm, and the Contra Costa District Attorney’s office is right in the middle of it,” said Gressett’s chief attorney Daniel Russo.

The rape allegations from within Contra Costa County’s District Attorney’s office were bound to make big headlines. Michael Gressett was a 51-year-old deputy district attorney who worked for the sexual assault unit. His alleged victim was a 29-year-old coworker who said Gressett violently assaulted her during a lunch break. The Martinez Police Department’s September 2008 press release was replete with lurid charges like “sodomy,” “forced oral copulation,” and “penetration with a foreign object.” The alleged props — including a gun, handcuffs, steak knife, ice cubes, and an ice pick — seemed plucked from the pages of a Marquis de Sade novel.

Not surprisingly, the story attracted wide attention. The San Francisco Chronicle assigned two reporters and the Contra Costa Times posted a complete copy of the criminal complaint on its web site. Television news joined the fray, and soon Gressett’s face was plastered all across the Bay Area. And no one followed the story more closely than the lawyers and politicians who work for Contra Costa County. So many people have viewed the case file that clerks in the courthouse keep it handy like it was a popular library book. When a reporter asked for the file by its case number, the clerk immediately said, “Oh, you want the Gressett file.”

The veteran prosecutor’s reputation as an office iconoclast only added to the case’s newsworthiness. Gressett has run for the position of Contra Costa County District Attorney three separate times, putting him in disfavor with the old-boy power structure that has controlled the office for decades. After the charges came to light, District Attorney Robert Kochly did what he could to distance his office from Gressett’s alleged behavior. “It’s a sad day for our office for anything like this to occur,” Kochly told the Chronicle. “Anything of this nature is devastating to the office. It’s antithetical to what we’re about.”

After his arrest, Gressett might have been expected to cease being a thorn in management’s side. Once he was released from jail on a $1 million bond, he was promptly fired. He now faces a possible life sentence for thirteen felony counts including rape, forced sodomy, forced oral copulation, and making death threats.

But instead of slinking away, his defense team has mounted an aggressive investigation that is shedding a withering light on both the DA’s office and the charges against him. The inquiry exposed an office sexual culture so highly charged that it makes HBO’s Mad Men look like pimply sophomores toeing their insteps at a high school dance mixer. The inquiry also sheds light on an unusual contract hiring system in which young attorneys like the alleged victim live in constant fear of losing their jobs. “Pandora’s box has been opened and what’s inside is not pretty,” said Michael Cardoza, one of Gressett’s defense attorneys. “I was a deputy district attorney for sixteen years and I am appalled at what goes on in that office.”

Read the rest here: http://www.eastbayexpress.com/gyrobase/a-troubled-rape-case/Content?oid=1371765&showFullText=true

« Previous Entries

Copyright © 2006 PhoneBdsm.com Designed By:EroticWebDesign.net